Vocabulary
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Key Difference
Think of “could” as a way to show general ability in the past. If you want to describe a skill or something you were typically able to do, “could” is usually the best choice. It doesn’t focus on one specific moment; rather, it talks about something you could do anytime.
(This is a general ability in the past.)
🔹 Use “could” when you’re talking about something you were able to do regularly or generally in the past.
“Was/Were able to” is ideal when you’re talking about a specific event or moment where you succeeded in doing something. It often implies that the action required effort, opportunity, or luck, and that achieving it wasn’t guaranteed.
🔹 Choose “was/were able to” when you’re discussing a single, completed action where you succeeded, especially if there were challenges involved.
In the negative form, “couldn’t” and “wasn’t/weren’t able to” are often interchangeable. Both mean that someone failed to do something in the past.
Either form works here because they both convey that they tried but didn’t succeed.
Practice Makes Perfect: Exercise Time!
Choose “could” or “was/were able to” to complete the sentences.
Answers:
Pro Tip 🌟