vocabulary
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Hello! The term “Pyrrhic victory” originates from the ancient battles of King Pyrrhus of Epirus, a Greek general and ruler who fought against the Romans in the 3rd century BCE. In 279 BCE, Pyrrhus led his forces in a fierce battle against the Romans at Asculum (in modern Italy) and managed to win. However, the victory came at a massive cost: Pyrrhus lost a significant portion of his army, including many of his most capable officers and soldiers.
After the battle, it’s said that Pyrrhus remarked, “If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined.” His victory over the Romans had inflicted such heavy losses on his side that it undermined his chances of continuing the campaign. Thus, the term “Pyrrhic victory” refers to a win that comes at such a great cost that it is almost as damaging as a defeat.
In modern usage, a Pyrrhic victory describes any situation where someone achieves their goal but with such expense or sacrifice that it negates the sense of accomplishment. For example, if a team wins a game but loses key players to injury, the victory could be considered Pyrrhic.