vocabulary
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Key Difference
Let’s dive a bit deeper to understand each and see how to use them effectively!
1. Using “Must Have” for Past Deductions
“Must have” is used when we feel almost certain that something happened in the past based on the information we have. Imagine you’re a detective piecing clues together, and the clues make it very likely that something occurred.
Here, you’re making a strong assumption that something did happen because of other clues you’ve observed or know about.
2. Using “Can’t Have” for Past Deductions
“Can’t have” is used when we feel almost certain that something did not happen. This is like concluding that something would be impossible or very unlikely to have occurred given the evidence.
So, with “can’t have,” you’re strongly assuming that an event did not happen because of the available evidence.
🕵️♀️ Detective Analogy
Imagine you’re a detective investigating a scene. You see an empty coffee cup and an unmade bed:
📝 Practice Time!
Try these practice sentences to check your understanding. Choose either “must have” or “can’t have”:
✅ Answer Key: